[Discussion] can we stop arguing about MHRA until somebody posts a number
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: can we stop arguing about MHRA until somebody posts a number. Discharged at goal back to the GP, who would not continue it. Nobody had mentioned that this was how it ends. Switched pharmacies mid-titration and had to restart the ladder because the…
Same. My ICB threshold was different from the neighbouring one and nobody could tell me why.
Added a nation tag — the answers to this question differ across the four.
Disagree. That is the pathway in one ICB and it does not generalise even to the next one over.
Disagree.
ines_lindqvist is right that the two routes are separate. A private prescription does not move you up the list.
Added a nation tag — the answers to this question differ across the four.
Agreed — and keeping the letters with dates is what makes any later challenge possible.
the ICB decides the threshold and they are not the same across England
Careful, that pricing figure is a headline offer with conditions attached rather than the actual monthly cost.
no referral links, ever, and that rule is why the pricing threads work
the Irish scheme cap is the single most useful fact in this board
I would not read a supply notice as a shortage in your pharmacy tomorrow. They are not the same thing.
I would not read a supply notice as a shortage in your pharmacy tomorrow.
Adding the practical bit — ask what happens at discharge before you start, not after.
Small fix — that is the Scottish pathway. The post is asking about England and the answer is different.
GP said no in the spring, specialist said yes eighteen months later. Same person, same numbers.
I would not read a supply notice as a shortage in your pharmacy tomorrow.
This is why national advice does not work here. It is commissioned locally and it varies.