GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
654
c/glp1muscle·posted 1 year ago by u/lina_bruun

resistance training is the most under-discussed thing on this board

Training Receipts ×2

Thinking out loud about this: resistance training is the most under-discussed thing on this board.

Reduced appetite makes hitting a protein target a logistics problem rather than a motivation problem, which is why the practical advice here is about timing and food choice rather than willpower.

Nothing here is a training or nutrition prescription. Targets and programmes are matters for somebody who knows your history and your training background.

Two scans on the same machine 17 months apart. Lean mass held better than I expected and the lifts told the same story for free.

Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.

840 up / 186 down82% upvoted12 commentsid 4l1rsu20 Oct 2024

12 comments

12 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/sarcopenia_watch126 points·1 year ago

On comparing yourself to composition figures from trials.

Published composition data comes from supervised populations with structured protocols, standardised scanning, and analysis populations that have been defined in advance. Your two scans at a local clinic, taken in different states of hydration, are not the same measurement.

Use your own baseline. The question worth asking is whether your own trajectory is going the way you want given what you are actually doing, and the honest answer usually requires measuring protein rather than estimating it and being truthful about training frequency. Neither of those is advice — a programme and a target are things to work out with somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_bruunOP83 points·1 year ago

Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru93 points·1 year ago

resistance training first, cardio if there is time left

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram_only27 points·1 year ago

resistance training first, cardio if there is time left

This is the whole intervention. Protein and resistance training.

replysharereportpermalink
u/TitrationTortoiseslow and boring75 points·1 year ago

Disagree — slower loss does not automatically preserve lean mass. Protein and training do the work, not the rate on its own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik57 points·1 year ago

Right — strength retention is a free proxy and it tracks better than most people expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_weiss16 points·1 year ago

Resistance training, and at what frequency?

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_boateng77 points·1 year ago

Same DEXA machine both times?

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_mbeki-22 points·1 year ago

the same DEXA machine or it is not a comparison

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko68 points·1 year ago

Same. Volume over novelty. Changing programme every six weeks cost me a year.

replysharereportpermalink
u/first_pen_fear100 points·1 year ago·edited

Started weighing protein rather than estimating it. The gap between what I thought and what I ate was embarrassing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_bruun28 points·1 year ago

Hydration status and fasting state affect the lean mass estimate. Standardising both is the difference between a comparison and a coin toss.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.