GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
0
c/glp1muscle·posted 1 year ago by u/bence_zamora

three years of resistance training threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Results Slow Clap ×9

Something I keep coming back to: three years of resistance training threads, summarised so you do not have to read them.

Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.

Tracked grip strength and three lifts monthly. Cheaper than scanning and directionally the same answer.

Compared two scans from different clinics and panicked over a difference that was inside the error margin.

Happy to answer the boring questions. Those are usually the ones worth asking.

0 up / 0 down41% upvoted5 commentsid 3r2ypx12 Aug 2024

5 comments

5 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp7 points·1 year ago

How to make a DEXA comparison mean anything.

Same machine, same clinic, same protocol. Same hydration and fasting state, as far as you can manage. At least three to four months apart, because the measurement error is large relative to short-term change. Three scans rather than two, because the first pair cannot distinguish a trend from noise.

Do less than that and you have two numbers with an offset of unknown size, which people then react to by rebuilding a training programme. The free alternative — a few tracked lifts and a monthly waist measurement — is directionally informative, costs nothing, and is far harder to over-interpret.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bence_zamoraOP3 points·1 year ago·edited

do not compare your composition to a trial average

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]2 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak1 point·1 year ago·edited

I would not change the programme on the strength of one scan. The measurement error is larger than the effect you are reacting to.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram6 points·1 year ago

Push back: strength dropping in a deficit is not the same as lean mass loss. Related, not identical.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.