GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of am I the only one who found resistance training harder than the injections — 50 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/glp1muscle·submitted 8 months ago by u/trialwatch_theo

am I the only one who found resistance training harder than the injections

Databranch of 6 comments

Genuine question, and the title is the question: am I the only one who found resistance training harder than the injections. Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month. Two scans on the same machine 20 months apart. Lean mass held better than I…

Read the full submission and all 50 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 8 months ago
u/ferran_krastev272 points·8 months ago

Lost slower for six months deliberately and my composition change was not obviously different. Training was what mattered.

replysharereportpermalink
u/trialwatch_theoOPtrial nerd114 points·8 months ago

training volume matters more than training novelty

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosa155 points·8 months ago

Tracked grip strength and three lifts monthly. Cheaper than scanning and directionally the same answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tobias_vukovic77 points·8 months ago

do not compare your composition to a trial average

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_kjaer124 points·8 months ago

strength retention is a decent proxy and it is free

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard125 points·8 months ago

Lost slower for six months deliberately and my composition change was not obviously different.

ferran_krastev is right that protein becomes a logistics problem when appetite drops.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/glp1muscle
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/lift_heavy_thingsu/protein_first_pu/dexa_twice_yearlyu/sarcopenia_watch
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →