[Discussion] we are measuring CagriSema at the wrong time and calling it noise
we are measuring CagriSema at the wrong time and calling it noise. I have gone back and forth on this for months. Carried an assumption over from the tirzepatide board and was corrected within an hour. Deserved. Dosing intuitions from the GLP-1 boards do not transfer. Different receptor family, different…
Left up. Thin evidence base, honestly labelled, which is the standard here.
Complementary mechanisms are the rationale for pairing: satiety signalling alongside incretin signalling, rather than more agonism at the same receptor.
Nothing containing this compound is approved as a standalone product, and research-use-only material is not approved for human use.
I would not extrapolate the tolerability profile from the monotherapy arm to the combination. The trials report them separately for a reason.
nothing containing this is approved as a standalone product
Small fix — amylin analogue, not a GLP-1 analogue. The whole mechanism argument changes on that word.
Correction: that is the combination programme, not the monotherapy readout. Different arms, different numbers.