interesting rodent data, almost no human data, both things are true
interesting rodent data, almost no human data, both things are true, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. It is a fifteen-residue peptide with a published sequence, which makes synthesis straightforward and makes identity verification the meaningful test rather than an optional extra.…
Was there identity confirmation, or only a purity figure?
Left up. It distinguishes rodent work from human work, which is the standard on this board.
Asked QYB for the theoretical mass alongside the certificate and they sent it without asking why.
ask for the mass spectrum, not just the purity number
Not convinced. A high purity figure with no identity confirmation tells you the sample is homogeneous, not that it is what you ordered.
Yes — the rodent literature is real and it is rodent literature. The gap to a human claim is enormous and it gets crossed in one sentence here.
the tendon claims are the most repeated and the least evidenced