GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why — 43 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/bpc157·submitted 4 months ago by u/meal_prep_mira

my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why

Scepticbranch of 8 comments

Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why. Asked GGPeps for the theoretical mass alongside the certificate and they sent it without asking why. Went and read the primary rodent papers after arguing about a summary for a week. They are much…

Read the full submission and all 43 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 4 months ago
u/neha_falk112 points·4 months ago

Purity by area percent tells you the sample is homogeneous. Mass spectrometry tells you what the homogeneous thing is. For a short peptide, the second question is the one worth paying for.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_bakken90 points·4 months ago

sequence confirmation is the test worth paying for

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldi26 points·4 months ago

short peptides are cheap, which cuts both ways

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_brandt13 points·4 months ago·edited

Do you have the mass spectrum?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani15 points·4 months ago

Do you have the mass spectrum?

Disagreeing with this line: that paper is in a rodent model and it is being quoted as a human result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/line_petrov9 points·4 months ago

no clinical trial has established what these threads assert

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology70 points·4 months ago

Yes — the rodent literature is real and it is rodent literature. The gap to a human claim is enormous and it gets crossed in one sentence here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain-34 points·4 months ago

That claim traces back to a single preclinical paper that says something considerably narrower.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.