u/milos_trevino

the trend line matters more than any single value

the appendix is where the interesting tables live

Small fix — a reference interval is not a treatment target, and the post above uses them interchangeably.

Did anything else change in that window — training, intake, hydration?

the trend line matters more than any single value

How long was the randomised phase before any extension?

area percent unless the report says otherwise

Adding the boring but useful bit: say whether you paid for it. It is the basis of the whole log.

Went looking for the registered protocol to see whether the endpoint had changed. It had not, which was reassuring and worth checking.

Compared two draws across two labs and spent a week worrying before finding out the assays were different.

Not convinced by the comparison. Different services, different gradients, and you are treating one as ground truth.

Same view — strict evidence rules make this board slower and make the archive worth reading in three years.

Which trial, and which arm?

weight loss itself moves several of these independently