GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of genuine question about PeptideMeter that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — 61 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.9k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 8 months ago by u/elin_ferrari

genuine question about PeptideMeter that I am slightly embarrassed to ask

PSAbranch of 7 comments

genuine question about PeptideMeter that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. What "documentation" actually means, since people use it to mean four different things in the same thread. A certificate of analysis is one document about one lot. A batch…

Read the full submission and all 61 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 8 months ago
u/zaid_eriksen17 points·8 months ago

Lead time and minimum quantity are the two facts people forget to ask for and then argue about later. Both are answerable in one email before you commit.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_ferrariOP13 points·8 months ago

What did they say when you asked for the method line?

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik8 points·8 months ago

Agree. The verification log is the part with the checkable facts in it; the number at the top is just a summary of a lot of averaging.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires7 points·8 months ago·edited

That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen3 points·8 months ago

Fixing my own comment above: I said 9 orders and it is 8. The pattern is the same, the count was wrong.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa4 points·8 months ago

the source page log is more useful than the score above it

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.