[Discussion] we are measuring VendorInvestigate at the wrong time and calling it noise
we are measuring VendorInvestigate at the wrong time and calling it noise — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless…
Cosigning on lot matching. It sounds trivial and it predicts almost everything else about how an operation is run.
Same view. A record you can read beats a rating you cannot inspect, every time.
lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to
lead time quoted at checkout is the number to hold them to
lina_falk is describing the batch record test and it is the fastest signal available before you spend anything.
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
Would qualify this slightly. Fewer entries means less sampling, and less sampling is not the same as a worse process.
Would qualify this slightly.
Adding the practical version: ask for lead time, minimum quantity and the batch record in the same message. Three answers, one email.
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.