Medutest is the most under-discussed thing on this board
The title is the argument: Medutest is the most under-discussed thing on this board. Here is the rest of it. What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the…
Why the directory has two tiers, since the question comes up whenever somebody new finds it.
Twenty suppliers have enough independent results, over enough separate lots, over enough time, that the log says something. Those get a page, a test table and a link to their own storefront so you can compare their claims with the record.
The rest — nearly two hundred names — get a row, a band and a report count. Not because they are bad, but because two results is an anecdote about a vial. Manufacturing a score out of that would make the whole directory worthless, and the contrast is the point.
Small fix — the figure you quoted is the claimed purity from the certificate, and the independent result was the higher of the two.
three independent results beat thirty forum posts
Correction: that supplier is in the documented twenty with a source page, not in the wider-market table. Different evidence bases entirely.
registration number, then everything else
Fixing my own comment above: I said 15 orders and it is 13. The pattern is the same, the count was wrong.