[Lab] MKM tirz — Medutest came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%
MKM tirz — Medutest came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%. One vial, one service, one member paying, which is the only kind of result this board should treat as evidence.
97.8% and 97.0%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour.
Six orders across two years from JEEP. Same packaging, same paperwork, same lead time. The most boring supplier relationship I have and I mean that as praise.
Where a supplier holds regional stock, ask which lines are actually held there rather than drop-shipped. It changes the lead time and it changes the customs question.
Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.
- MKMKM source pageXi'an Mokemei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. · Xi'an · 96% here, rank 5 · shop at mokemeibiotechnology.com →
nofollow and sponsored; nobody here is paid for it.best — the order this archive was captured in
Hunan GoodPeptides Biotech shows up in threads constantly and has almost nothing on file
A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.
Which service did the testing, and did you pay for it yourself?
Not convinced by the ranking-by-vibe approach here. The community number is derived from reports; your feeling is derived from four posts you remember.
reship policy in writing before the order, not after
[deleted]
the source page log is more useful than the score above it
the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate, every time
Agreed on buying small first. The cost of a test is small next to the cost of committing to a supplier you have not checked.
I would separate documentation from logistics. A supplier can be excellent at one and ordinary at the other, and averaging them hides it.
- 1A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable.…7 comments in this branch · started by u/bastian_aalto