[Question] is 99.3% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error
The claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: is 99.3% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error. Nothing implied beyond it. Pulling the figures out of the title: 99.3%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. The step schedule question, answered properly, because it…
The 21% figure is a 72-week mean on the highest arm. Quoting it as what someone should expect by week 18 is not a fair reading.
The 21% figure is a 72-week mean on the highest arm.
swirl_dont_shake is right that the two molecules are not interchangeable. There is no published conversion and the ones circulating are invented.
swirl_dont_shake is right that the two molecules are not interchangeable.
Not sure about this bit. The GIP arm being real does not tell you that it is what caused your particular week.
stepping every four weeks is a ceiling on speed, not a schedule you must hit
a lot of people plateau nicely at 10mg and never need 15
the trials titrated on a calendar, real people titrate on symptoms
dual agonist, so the GIP arm is doing something the sema threads will not tell you about