small win: Mounjaro stopped being a problem at week 45
small win: Mounjaro stopped being a problem at week 45. This is a description of what happened to me and not a plan for anybody else.
Vials and pens carry the same molecule; what differs is fill volume, device tolerance and whether you are doing your own arithmetic. Neither is inherently more accurate.
The four-week interval in the label is a minimum. Nothing about the pharmacology requires you to step on schedule, and the trials stepped on a calendar because trials have to.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The distribution matters more than the mean. In the trial population the interquartile spread was wide enough that two honest people can have completely different runs on the same arm.
It is a dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, and the GIP arm is the part that has no equivalent in the semaglutide threads. That is why the side-effect profile reads differently rather than just milder.
SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change. SURPASS is the diabetes programme and reports glycaemic endpoints, so quoting the two interchangeably is a category error.
Sulphur burps for the first eight days after each step, then nothing. Predictable enough that I planned my week around it.
Have you held a step for longer than the four-week minimum at any point?
Have you held a step for longer than the four-week minimum at any point?
Agreed, with one qualifier: that is the mean of the top arm and the spread around it was enormous.
[deleted]
Small fix: SURMOUNT is the obesity programme, SURPASS is the type-2 programme. They are different endpoints and the numbers do not transfer.
Yes. I stepped to 12.5 because the calendar said so, not because anything needed fixing, and I regretted it for a fortnight.
zepbound and mounjaro are the same compound with different labels
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. Anything in this thread about how a research vial "should" titrate is a discussion about chemistry, not a plan.
- 1It is a dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, and the GIP arm is the part…9 comments in this branch · started by u/fatima_wojcik