[Question] how do you actually verify GIP
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: how do you actually verify GIP.
Vials and pens carry the same molecule; what differs is fill volume, device tolerance and whether you are doing your own arithmetic. Neither is inherently more accurate.
Went 10 to 12.5 on the calendar and had the worst fortnight of the whole run. Dropped back to 10 and everything settled.
The distribution matters more than the mean. In the trial population the interquartile spread was wide enough that two honest people can have completely different runs on the same arm.
Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change. SURPASS is the diabetes programme and reports glycaemic endpoints, so quoting the two interchangeably is a category error.
Left up, flair changed to Discussion. It is an opinion post and that is fine as long as it is labelled.
That percentage is body weight change, not body fat. Different measurement, and the distinction gets lost every time.
2.5mg is a four-week starting dose, not a maintenance dose. Worth being precise since people search these threads.
Same experience with the appetite effect being flatter across the week rather than front-loaded.
Disagree with the conversion table. There is no validated equivalence between the two molecules and posting one as though there is does real damage.
- 1SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change.…6 comments in this branch · started by u/dario_stanescu