unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about GIP is guesswork
unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about GIP is guesswork. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change. SURPASS is the diabetes programme and reports glycaemic endpoints, so quoting the two…
Right. And the sema-to-tirz "conversion" people post is invented. There is no published equivalence.
That percentage is body weight change, not body fat. Different measurement, and the distinction gets lost every time.
Cosigning the four-week thing. It is a minimum interval, and treating it as a schedule to keep up with is how people end up miserable at 12.5.
Yes. I stepped to 12.5 because the calendar said so, not because anything needed fixing, and I regretted it for a fortnight.
Held 7.5 for five months. Everyone kept asking when I was going to 10. The answer was never, because 7.5 was working.
Vials and pens carry the same molecule; what differs is fill volume, device tolerance and whether you are doing your own arithmetic. Neither is inherently more accurate.
Did you come to this from sema, and if so how long was the gap?