[Discussion] can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number
can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. Postprandial excursions typically respond earlier than fasting glucose, so the sequence people observe is not a sign that something is not working. Sensor accuracy varies across wear, and…
A1c reflects average glycaemia over roughly the preceding three months, weighted towards the most recent weeks. It cannot show variability and it lags any change you make.
A1c reflects average glycaemia over roughly the preceding three months, weighted towards the most recent weeks.
This is the distinction that resolves most of the confusion here — average versus shape.
sensor accuracy varies and the first day of a sensor is the worst
Assumed the weight endpoints from the obesity trials applied to my situation. They are different programmes.
Kept fingersticks alongside the sensor for two weeks to sanity-check it. Worth doing once.
time in range is the more informative number and it is newer