GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
677
c/t2dglp1·submitted 8 months ago by u/arne_nyberg

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

can we stop arguing about T2D until somebody posts a number. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. Postprandial excursions typically respond earlier than fasting glucose, so the sequence people observe is not a sign that something is not working. Sensor accuracy varies across wear, and…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 8 months ago
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain42 points·8 months ago

A1c reflects average glycaemia over roughly the preceding three months, weighted towards the most recent weeks. It cannot show variability and it lags any change you make.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwah20 points·8 months ago

A1c reflects average glycaemia over roughly the preceding three months, weighted towards the most recent weeks.

This is the distinction that resolves most of the confusion here — average versus shape.

replysharereportpermalink
u/a1c_arcT2D17 points·8 months ago

sensor accuracy varies and the first day of a sensor is the worst

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_norgaard14 points·8 months ago

a single high reading is not a trend

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/tomas_lokken25 points·8 months ago

Kept fingersticks alongside the sensor for two weeks to sanity-check it. Worth doing once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren10 points·8 months ago

time in range is the more informative number and it is newer

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/t2dglp1

Type 2 diabetes as the original indication: A1c trajectories, CGM traces, hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with sulfonylureas or insulin, metformin combinations, and why the weight-loss conversation sometimes drowns out the glycaemic one.

36kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/t2dglp1 rules
  1. Insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are a real hypo risk. Do not hand-wave them.
  2. Post A1c with units and the assay date.
  3. No medication-stopping advice. Ever.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.