how much of what we believe about CGM actually comes from T2D threads
how much of what we believe about CGM actually comes from T2D threads. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. The three numbers, and what each one can and cannot tell you. A1c is an average over about three months, weighted to the recent weeks. It cannot show variability and it lags…
Continuous monitoring shows the shape: postprandial excursions, overnight behaviour and time in range. Two people with identical A1c can have very different distributions.
Retitled — the original quoted an obesity endpoint as a glycaemic one.
That is a sensor value, not a plasma value, and the two are not interchangeable at that level of precision.
Agreed. A1c is an integrated average over roughly three months and treating it as a current reading causes a lot of unnecessary alarm.
Correction: that trial is the diabetes programme and the figure you quoted is its glycaemic endpoint, not a weight result.