GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about MASH is guesswork — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
129
c/survodutide·submitted 6 months ago by u/dario_boateng

unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about MASH is guesswork

Trial Databranch of 8 comments

unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about MASH is guesswork. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Asked here what the difference was between the imaging and biopsy endpoints and got a genuinely excellent answer. Bought small because the evidence base is early. That is the…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 6 months ago
u/cato_girard22 points·6 months ago

The escalation schedules in the published protocols are slow and deliberate, and the tolerability tables show why. That is a description of the trials rather than a suggestion for anybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/old_account_20237 points·6 months ago

the titration in the trials was slow and deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/certified_referenceQC4 points·6 months ago

read the histology endpoint definitions before quoting a response rate

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_villalobos7 points·6 months ago

Assumed the weight numbers were the point and was corrected. They are secondary to what this is being developed for.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_boatengOP4 points·6 months ago·edited

Assumed the weight numbers were the point and was corrected.

This is the framing the board needs. It is a hepatic programme first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_boatengOP2 points·6 months ago

Small fix — dual agonist, GLP-1 and glucagon. No GIP arm in this molecule.

replysharereportpermalink
u/diego_szabo1 point·6 months ago

Cosigning on the glucagon arm. It is the mechanistic thread that connects the hepatic and the metabolic effects.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki1 point·6 months ago

phase 2 in liver disease is a different evidence question from weight

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.