[Lab] 8th independent test on JEEP — 97.2% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part
Result first, context after: 8th independent test on JEEP — 97.2% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part . Everything below is how it was ordered, stored and sent. Numbers, in the order they matter: 97.2% and 97.0%. Histological endpoints in this field are scored on biopsy: resolution of…
Phase 2 in a biopsy-confirmed population is a demanding design: recruitment is slow, the population is specific, and the results do not generalise to people who have not been characterised that way.
Phase 2 in a biopsy-confirmed population is a demanding design: recruitment is slow, the population is specific, and the results do not generalise to
julia_mensa is right that biopsy and imaging endpoints are not interchangeable.
That figure is from the obesity programme, and this thread is about the hepatic one.
That figure is from the obesity programme, and this thread is about the hepatic one.
Agreed — and the endpoint definitions are where the actual claim lives.
Small fix — dual agonist, GLP-1 and glucagon. No GIP arm in this molecule.
The escalation schedules in the published protocols are slow and deliberate, and the tolerability tables show why. That is a description of the trials rather than a suggestion for anybody.
What does the tolerability table say at that dose?
This. Biopsy-confirmed and imaging-suggested are different evidentiary categories and get run together constantly.