GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about PDF metadata until somebody posts a number — 40 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.3k
c/scamalerts·submitted 10 months ago by u/camila_sandvik

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about PDF metadata until somebody posts a number

Unverifiedbranch of 6 comments

can we stop arguing about PDF metadata until somebody posts a number — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that pushed hard for a decision the same day. Every time I see that pressure now I close the tab. Reported something here with dates and…

Read the full submission and all 40 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 10 months ago
u/scam_taxonomyMOD87 points·10 months ago

Removed — names an individual. That rule has no exceptions here, including when the account turns out to be accurate.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvikOP45 points·10 months ago·edited

ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry51 points·10 months ago

ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun60 points·10 months ago

ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything

Adding the practical version: buy small from anyone new, test it, then decide.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]60 points·10 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/protein_first_pnutrition40 points·10 months ago

Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →