GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] cloned site — what am I missing here — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
466
c/scamalerts·submitted 11 months ago by u/chidi_vermeulen

[Question] cloned site — what am I missing here

Questionbranch of 7 comments

Trying to get a straight answer on this: cloned site — what am I missing here. The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty. A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 11 months ago
u/rania_diallo6 points·11 months ago

Same. A batch-specific document requested before payment costs nothing and filters an enormous amount.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_notes4 points·11 months ago

Is there any independent testing on file for this name anywhere?

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_nkemelu2 points·11 months ago

Is there any independent testing on file for this name anywhere?

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history0 points·11 months ago

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

Adding the practical version: buy small from anyone new, test it, then decide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard3 points·11 months ago

This. Anything urging you to decide today is doing so for its own reasons.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts2 points·11 months ago

check the domain character by character before you check anything else

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_nkemelu2 points·11 months ago

This.

This is the check that catches most of it, and it takes under a minute.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.