[Resolved] accused a vendor of a fake COA. i was wrong. correcting the record.
Short report. accused a vendor of a fake COA. i was wrong. correcting the record. Dates and lane below. Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape. Ask for the batch-specific…
Right, and the group-buy structure is the underrated risk here. One person holds everything and there is no recourse designed in.
Removed — names an individual. That rule has no exceptions here, including when the account turns out to be accurate.
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
Cosigning the domain check. Character by character, every time, and paste it rather than typing it.
a domain registered last month with a decade of testimonials is the whole tell
ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything
[deleted]
Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
Agreed on the no-names rule. It protects the board and it protects people who turn out to be wrong.