does fraud actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: does fraud actually matter or is it forum lore at this point. Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names. A report that says "X is a scam" is unfalsifiable and unactionable. A report that says "ordered on this date, paid this…
Left up. It carries dates, a domain and a document trail, which is what a report on this board looks like.
What did the storefront say the lead time was?
Ask for the batch-specific certificate before payment. Any operation with a quality system behind it can produce one; the request costs you nothing and it filters hard.
Yes. The thin-evidence names in the directory are thin because nobody has anything on them, which is a different statement from a warning.
Yes.
muscle_cramp_mo has the group-buy risk right — it is structural, not a judgement about anybody in particular.
Has anyone else in the thread got the same domain in their history?
[removed by moderator]
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.