cloned site is the most under-discussed thing on this board
cloned site is the most under-discussed thing on this board. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here.
Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it because one character in the domain was wrong and I paste rather than type.
The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty.
Ask for the batch-specific certificate before payment. Any operation with a quality system behind it can produce one; the request costs you nothing and it filters hard.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Domain age, registrar and certificate issuance date are all public and take about a minute to check. A site claiming years of history on a months-old domain is the cheapest signal available.
Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.
a cloned storefront copies the design, never the documentation
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
What dates are we talking about — order, payment, last contact?
What dates are we talking about — order, payment, last contact?
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.