GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.3k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/sock_puppet_spotter

[Lab] 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part

Resolvedbranch of 8 comments

Short version of the title, which is already short: 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part. Longer version underneath. Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.9% and 97.5%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. The group-buy…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/kaplan_meier_kim56 points·1 year ago

Nearly paid a cloned storefront. Caught it because one character in the domain was wrong and I paste rather than type.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts17 points·1 year ago

Right, and the group-buy structure is the underrated risk here. One person holds everything and there is no recourse designed in.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_wojcik67 points·1 year ago

Nearly paid a cloned storefront.

Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei46 points·1 year ago

Push back: "nobody has tested them" is a fact about this board, not a fact about the company. Say the first one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_notes19 points·1 year ago·edited

Peptidology gets named here constantly and there is nothing verifiable on file either way

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_dahlberg6 points·1 year ago

screenshots are not evidence, dates and documents are

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo15 points·1 year ago

A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.

replysharereportpermalink
u/customs_seizure_sid14 points·1 year ago

Did you ask for a batch-specific document before paying?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.