GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get early fullness at week 64 — 32 comments in the full submission. View in context.
523
c/retatrutide·submitted 1 year ago by u/lina_bruun

is it normal to get early fullness at week 64

Trial Databranch of 6 comments

Check-in as promised in the title: is it normal to get early fullness at week 64. Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and that is a statement of fact rather than a disclaimer. Independent purity testing on this compound is thin compared with…

Read the full submission and all 32 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/fabio_lehtinen8 points·1 year ago

Agreed, and the framing that helps is: this is a phase 2 compound with phase 3 running. Everything else is inference.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy4 points·1 year ago

Are you tracking heart rate at all?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro5 points·1 year ago

Watched heart rate on a wearable across twelve weeks because the threads said to. It moved a little and I have no idea whether that means anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_molnar0 points·1 year ago

Watched heart rate on a wearable across twelve weeks because the threads said to.

This is the sentence the rest of the board should read first. Phase 2 is not a label.

replysharereportpermalink
u/heart_rate_bump1 point·1 year ago

Has anyone posted an independent test on this compound recently?

replysharereportpermalink
u/burned_once_twice4 points·1 year ago

Sceptical of the extrapolation. Forty-eight weeks does not tell you about seventy-two, and the curve shape is exactly what is unknown.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/retatrutide
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/reta_and_regretu/trialwatch_theou/incretin_ivyu/ledger_mod
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →