GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.5k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/ewan_marchand

[Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Resultsbranch of 8 comments

45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring, and the part I actually want to talk about is at the bottom. Pulling the figures out of the title: 45 weeks and 10mg. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/rohan_cardoso19 points·2 years ago

The phase 2 readout ran to 48 weeks in a few hundred participants with a slow escalation. Both the size and the duration matter when people quote the headline number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchandOP12 points·2 years ago

Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]8 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchandOP6 points·2 years ago

Correcting my own comment above: that figure was the 36-week interim, not the 48-week endpoint.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman3 points·2 years ago

This. The phase 2 result was genuinely large and it was also 48 weeks in a few hundred people.

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsen4 points·2 years ago

Correcting my own comment above: that figure was the 36-week interim, not the 48-week endpoint.

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tired_ledger_notes6 points·2 years ago

Sceptical of the extrapolation. Forty-eight weeks does not tell you about seventy-two, and the curve shape is exactly what is unknown.

replysharereportpermalink
u/heart_rate_bump7 points·2 years ago

small trial, big effect, wide error bars

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.