reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Thinking out loud about this: reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly. On the thin testing history in this board, and what to do about it. Most of the compounds discussed here have a handful of independent results across the entire site, and several have none. That is a fact about how few members…
Net peptide content on the certificate was well below the purity figure and both were honest. Chemistry, not deception.
Net peptide content on the certificate was well below the purity figure and both were honest.
Disagreeing with this bit: handling for one compound does not transfer to another by default.
Yes. Nothing in this catalogue is approved for human use and the board should keep saying so.
Asked for identity confirmation on an unusual line and got a mass spectrum with the theoretical mass alongside. That is the answer I now look for everywhere.
Bought small on anything without a testing history here. That rule has never once cost me anything.
lead times on unusual lines are the thing to confirm up front