GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for — 50 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/progresspics·submitted 1 year ago by u/elise_ramos

[Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

progress is doing more work than we give it credit for, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. A goal weight chosen before starting is a prediction made with the least information you will ever have. Revising it is ordinary rather than a failure. Stalled for 10 weeks and measured my waist…

Read the full submission and all 50 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/anders_karlsen43 points·1 year ago

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly trend is signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/georgi_adebayo20 points·1 year ago

the timeframe matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramosOP24 points·1 year ago

Correcting my own post above — that was week 77, not the week I wrote. Same story, wrong number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei35 points·1 year ago

comparison is the thief of everything on a board like this

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_correia27 points·1 year ago

Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because composition changes are not visible on a bathroom scale.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_chowdhury17 points·1 year ago

Push back on the goal number. You chose it before you knew what any of this felt like.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.