GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for — 50 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/progresspics·submitted 1 year ago by u/elise_ramos

[Discussion] progress is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

progress is doing more work than we give it credit for, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. A goal weight chosen before starting is a prediction made with the least information you will ever have. Revising it is ordinary rather than a failure. Stalled for 10 weeks and measured my waist…

Read the full submission and all 50 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 year ago
u/sigrid_kaufmann115 points·1 year ago

goal weights chosen at week one are usually guesses

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_mensah28 points·1 year ago

text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think

replysharereportpermalink
u/gradient_goblin20 points·1 year ago

Correction: 19kg over 19 months is a different claim from 19kg in a month, and the post reads as the second.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]9 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/plain_titration13 points·1 year ago

Did the clothes change before the number did for you too?

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramosOP9 points·1 year ago

progress is not linear and nobody’s is

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard15 points·1 year ago

This. Waist measurement kept moving through my longest stall and it was the only thing that kept me sane.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ferreira15 points·1 year ago

That is a waist measurement, not a weight, and the thread has been comparing them as though they were the same.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_g79 points·1 year ago

Text-only posting removes the comparison mechanism that makes image boards difficult, which is why this community adopted the rule and has kept it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic30 points·1 year ago

Agreed that goal weights picked at the start are guesses. Mine was, and I revised it twice.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.