switched from 1.0mg to 2.4mg and nausea got better, not worse
switched from 1.0mg to 2.4mg and nausea got better, not worse. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. Numbers, in the order they matter: 1.0mg and 2.4mg. Wrote down one non-scale thing every week. Reading a year of those back was more affecting than any number. Nobody noticed for…
Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly trend is signal.
I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain. Weight varies day to day in everybody.
That is a waist measurement, not a weight, and the thread has been comparing them as though they were the same.
The first thing I noticed was a jacket doing up. The scale had been flat for three weeks at that point.
text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think
Correcting my own post above — that was week 35, not the week I wrote. Same story, wrong number.
Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.
nobody owes anybody a starting weight
25kg over 6 months and honestly the most useful marker was that stairs stopped being a decision.
Gently disagree with the framing — that is not a plateau, that is a month. They are different things.
Yes. The middle is where everybody actually lives and almost nobody posts from it.
goal weights chosen at week one are usually guesses