GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Announcement] sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked — 12 comments in the full submission. View in context.
39
c/meta·submitted 13 days ago by u/joaquin_wojcik

[Announcement] sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked

Announcementbranch of 6 comments

sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked, and here is what changes in practice if it goes ahead. Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor…

Read the full submission and all 12 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 11 days ago
u/marisol_frisk6 points·11 days ago·edited

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rekha_mwangi8 points·11 days ago

A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated.

This is the principle the whole site is built on. Publish it or do not enforce it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris3 points·11 days ago

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe2 points·11 days ago

a rule you cannot inspect is just a preference

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_balogun-32 points·11 days ago

the disclosure is boring because it has to be

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers4 points·11 days ago

This is the principle the whole site is built on.

rekha_mwangi is right that the strict evidence rule is the asset, not the friction.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →