GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Rules] proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number — 15 comments in the full submission. View in context.
285
c/meta·submitted 3 days ago by u/dizzy_on_standing

[Rules] proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number

Rulesbranch of 7 comments

proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number. Short post, long comment section, probably. A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is what can be evaluated. Without it there is nothing to compare against the current text. Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the…

Read the full submission and all 15 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 days ago
u/sanne_novak39 points·1 days ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox2922 points·1 days ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga-38 points·1 days ago

Yes. Nobody here is paid and the disclosure page says so in tedious detail, which is the correct level of tedious.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand23 points·1 days ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted.

Adding the practical note — the formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering yourself.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing57 points·1 days ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_marchetti34 points·1 days ago

Who does this help, and who does it cost?

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_dahlberg28 points·22 hr ago

vendor source pages link storefronts and the link is marked

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →