GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts — 63 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.4k
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/dilara_nyberg

[Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts

Metabranch of 8 comments

proposal — a flair for moderation posts. Nothing about this affects the ranking maths, before anyone asks. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor units are labelled as sponsored. Each vendor source page carries one outbound link to that supplier’s own storefront, marked…

Read the full submission and all 63 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/rasmus_kuipers229 points·1 year ago

Have you read the published formula, genuinely asking?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain325 points·1 year ago

Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph106 points·1 year ago

I would not archive earlier. The old threads are the most-searched thing on the site.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_achebe54 points·1 year ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelMOD165 points·1 year ago

Left up and flaired Proposal — it has replacement wording, which is what this board asks for.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_nybergOP122 points·1 year ago

That is the controversial ordering, not the hot one. Different formula, different behaviour.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren39 points·1 year ago

removals get explained publicly where the rule allows it

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_petrescu78 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is published, go and read it

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →