GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of does wiki actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 36 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/meta·submitted 5 months ago by u/tomas_lundgren

does wiki actually matter or is it forum lore at this point

Announcementbranch of 8 comments

does wiki actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Sorted by controversial for a week and found four of the best threads I have read here. Edited a wiki page for the first time and nothing bad happened, which is apparently the point.…

Read the full submission and all 36 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 5 months ago
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts116 points·5 months ago

Feed position is a function of early votes and time. That structurally favours agreeable early answers over correct late ones, which is why sorting by controversial occasionally is worth the effort.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]42 points·5 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_diallo11 points·5 months ago·edited

vendor source pages link storefronts and the link is marked

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_wojcik9 points·5 months ago

the ranking formula is published, go and read it

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca20 points·5 months ago

removals get explained publicly where the rule allows it

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_ferreira10 points·5 months ago

the disclosure is boring because it has to be

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD79 points·5 months ago·edited

Reminder that no referral or affiliate links are permitted anywhere, from anybody, ever.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_jansen55 points·5 months ago

What would the new rule do to the vendor evidence standard?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →