GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
121
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/dario_petrescu

three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Announcementbranch of 9 comments

Something I keep coming back to: three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why. Sorted by controversial for a week and found four of the best threads I have…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 1 year ago
u/ice_pack_auditcold chain6 points·1 year ago

The ranking functions are published: the hot ordering combines score magnitude with age, and the controversial ordering weights total volume by the balance between up and down votes. Both are reproducible from the numbers on each submission.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp1 point·1 year ago

That is a complaint rather than a proposal. Bring wording and it can actually be discussed.

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_baptista5 points·1 year ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD4 points·1 year ago

Reminder that no referral or affiliate links are permitted anywhere, from anybody, ever.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph1 point·1 year ago

Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox291 point·1 year ago

this place sells nothing and takes nothing from any supplier

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescuOP2 points·1 year ago

nobody here is paid, including the moderators

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi2 points·1 year ago·edited

sort by controversial occasionally, it is worth it

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →