GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
121
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/dario_petrescu

three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Announcementbranch of 8 comments

Something I keep coming back to: three years of meta threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why. Sorted by controversial for a week and found four of the best threads I have…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/yusuf_achebe10 points·1 year ago

Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail rather than in threads, because a public discussion of one person’s removal is worse for that person than a private one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_laurent7 points·1 year ago

Agreed. Publishing the ranking formula is the difference between a feed and a black box, and it costs nothing to do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu5 points·1 year ago

I would not archive earlier. The old threads are the most-searched thing on the site.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan1 point·1 year ago·edited

I would not archive earlier.

Agreed — concrete wording or it is not a proposal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sterile_field_steph2 points·1 year ago

the ranking formula is published, go and read it

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weiss5 points·1 year ago

Agreed.

Disagreeing with this bit: making individual cases public by default is worse for the person being moderated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescuOP5 points·1 year ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink
u/arto_fonseca4 points·1 year ago·edited

Careful — that would make individual moderation cases public by default, which is worse for the person complaining.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →