GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date — 35 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/kenji_vasquez

[Discussion] the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

the moderation advice in here is 3 years out of date, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. Hard numbers: 3 years. Anything softer than that is flagged as an impression. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site and stopped arguing. Sorted by…

Read the full submission and all 35 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/marit_mwangi29 points·1 year ago

Checked the sponsor disclosure because I assumed it would be vague. It was extremely specific and slightly boring.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opsMOD21 points·1 year ago

Moved to modmail. Individual removals get a specific answer there rather than a public thread.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak30 points·1 year ago

Had a post removed, went to modmail, got a specific explanation and disagreed with it politely. It stayed removed and I understood why.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_kowalski25 points·1 year ago

Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the ordering in a spreadsheet. It does what it says.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_wojcik18 points·1 year ago

ranked feeds mean the top comment is not the best answer

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei10 points·1 year ago

Have you read the published formula, genuinely asking?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_vasquez-17 points·1 year ago

Proposed a rule change here with actual wording and it was adopted. That is the process working and it is not fast.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →