[Lab] 18th independent test on GL Biochem — 99.5% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part
18th independent test on GL Biochem — 99.5% on a claimed 99.0%, and the trend is the interesting part, and before anyone asks: same batch throughout, single submission, no cherry-picking between services.
99.5% and 99.0%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour.
Split one vial between Janoshik and Medutest. The two numbers were within half a point of each other and I stopped worrying about which lab to trust.
First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
- GLGL Biochem source pageGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. · Shanghai · 91% here, rank 15 · shop at glbiochem.net →
nofollow and sponsored; nobody here is paid for it.best — the order this archive was captured in
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.
net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting
Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.
How to build a series that means something, if you are going to spend money on testing anyway.
Three tests on one lot tells you about your measurement. Three tests on three lots, spread over a year, tells you about a process. The second is the one worth paying for and it costs the same.
Buy small, keep the batch numbers, send one vial per lot, and post each one with the claim next to it. After four or five you have something no individual review can give you: a band, a direction and a date range. That is what the source pages are made of.
[deleted]
Area percent or net peptide content?
Agreed on quoting the claim alongside the result. Half the arguments here are two people comparing to different reference numbers.
Area percent or net peptide content?
clara_weiss is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.
one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence
How many separate lots does your series cover?
I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.
say whether you paid for it yourself
three lots beats three tests on one lot
That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.
Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.
Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.
Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?
inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly
inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly
This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.
Not convinced by the comparison. Different services, different gradients, and you are treating one as ground truth.
That reading assumes area percent and net peptide content are the same number. They are not, and the report says which it is.
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
This. The trend across separate lots is the number that tells you about a process rather than a vial.
post the claim next to the result or the number floats
vendor, compound, batch, service, result — that is the template
- 1How to build a series that means something, if you are going to spend money…12 comments in this branch · started by u/janoshik_junkie
- 2Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and…6 comments in this branch · started by u/tomas_lundgren