GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
441
c/labresults·submitted 1 months ago by u/janoshik_junkie

[PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace

PeptideMeterbranch of 8 comments

The claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace. Nothing implied beyond it. To save the first four comments: 15mg and 98.4%. Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding. Split…

Read the full submission and all 22 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 months ago
u/anders_vermeulen0 points·1 months ago

If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen1 point·1 months ago

Tested three lots over a year rather than three vials from one lot. Cost the same and told me something completely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulen1 point·1 months ago

Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.

replysharereportpermalink
u/phase_two_pete1 point·1 months ago

Have now spent more on testing than on some of the orders. No regrets — the log is the reason I can buy without agonising.

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrol1 point·1 months ago

Not convinced by the comparison. Different services, different gradients, and you are treating one as ground truth.

replysharereportpermalink
u/refund_ledger1 point·1 months ago

Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieOPindependent tester1 point·1 months ago

Correcting myself: I quoted net peptide content against somebody else’s area percent. Not a comparison.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.