GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is — 57 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.9k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/mariam_cabrera

[PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is

Labbranch of 7 comments

Explainer, as requested in the last thread: test results are not what most of this community thinks it is. On inter-lab disagreement, which generates more heat here than anything else. Two services running different gradients, integrating differently, at possibly different wavelengths, will not produce identical…

Read the full submission and all 57 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/lukas_vermeulen104 points·2 years ago

Split one vial between Medutest and PeptideMeter. The two numbers were within half a point of each other and I stopped worrying about which lab to trust.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_wikstrom32 points·2 years ago

Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/endotoxin_elliemicro23 points·2 years ago

net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester28 points·2 years ago

First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.

replysharereportpermalink
u/peptidemeter_pat23 points·2 years ago

That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_ogunleye29 points·2 years ago·edited

Split one vial between Medutest and PeptideMeter.

lukas_vermeulen is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts8 points·2 years ago·edited

CPC came back 97.1% on a claimed 97.0%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.