GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of Medutest — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.3k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/yara_mensah

Medutest — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right

Janoshikbranch of 10 comments

Medutest — 8 things I got wrong before I got it right, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. What a result posted here is actually worth, and how to make yours worth more. A single figure with no batch identifier is about a vial nobody can locate. Add the batch and it becomes about a lot. Add the…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 year ago
u/anders_vermeulen249 points·1 year ago

A series across separate lots estimates a process. Repeat tests on one lot estimate the measurement. Both are useful and they answer different questions.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_mensahOP103 points·1 year ago·edited

What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_cardoso114 points·1 year ago

A series across separate lots estimates a process.

anders_vermeulen is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_ramos64 points·1 year ago

anders_vermeulen is right that the band matters more than the peak.

Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen83 points·1 year ago

date of analysis matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_44b160 points·1 year ago

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wanda174 points·1 year ago

First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]118 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ffmi_watcher48 points·1 year ago

the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_restrepo139 points·1 year ago

Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.