GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the formulary advice in here is 3 years out of date — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
172
c/insurancefights·submitted 1 year ago by u/camila_vasquez

[Discussion] the formulary advice in here is 3 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

the formulary advice in here is 3 years out of date. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 3 years. Step therapy requires documented trial of preferred alternatives. It is not an argument to be won on merits; it is a record to be produced, and…

Read the full submission and all 20 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/bence_zielinski21 points·1 year ago·edited

Internal appeals are decided by the plan. External review is decided by an independent body and, where it applies, its determination is binding. They are separate mechanisms and the second is chronically underused.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterMOD12 points·1 year ago

Left up. It carries dates, a criterion and an outcome, which is what makes these threads useful.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_vasquezOP-37 points·1 year ago

What is the appeal deadline on the letter?

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_notes1 point·1 year ago·edited

Push back: your plan is an employer plan, which changes both the appeal path and who the regulator is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fabio_kuipers1 point·1 year ago

prior authorisation criteria change every plan year

replysharereportpermalink
u/ignacio_vanhecke1 point·1 year ago

the second-level appeal is where things actually turn

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira1 point·1 year ago

the second-level appeal is where things actually turn

Disagreeing with this line: the deadline runs from the letter date and treating it otherwise is expensive.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/insurancefights

The paperwork war. Prior-authorisation criteria, denial reason codes, step-therapy documentation, external review, employer carve-outs, and the appeal letter templates the community has iterated on for three years. Mostly US-shaped but the tactics generalise.

46kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/insurancefights rules
  1. Say which country and which plan type. "Insurance" means eleven different things.
  2. Redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot.
  3. Do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis. That is fraud and it gets you banned.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.