GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 16th independent test on ERP — 97.4% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part — 50 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.6k
c/hplc·submitted 2 years ago by u/sofia_petrescu

[Lab] 16th independent test on ERP — 97.4% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part

Labbranch of 10 comments

Numbers in the title, numbers in the post. 16th independent test on ERP — 97.4% on a claimed 97.0%, and the trend is the interesting part. Since the title puts numbers in the shop window: 97.4% and 97.0%. Gave the same trace to two people I trust and got two integrations about a point apart. That was the most…

Read the full submission and all 50 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 years ago
u/clara_danquah159 points·2 years ago

Area percent is the integrated area of your peak over the total integrated area at one wavelength on one gradient. Change any of those and the number changes without the sample changing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_petrescuOP68 points·2 years ago·edited

214nm sees the peptide bond, 280nm sees the aromatics

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical104 points·2 years ago·edited

Correction: that is a tailing factor, not a plate count. Different diagnostics for different problems.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_petrescuOP61 points·2 years ago

What wavelength, and what was the gradient?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_petrescuOP32 points·2 years ago

What did system suitability look like on that sequence?

replysharereportpermalink
u/first_hundred194 points·2 years ago

Area percent is the integrated area of your peak over the total integrated area at one wavelength on one gradient.

This is the whole methodological point of the board in one line.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments92 points·2 years ago

This is the whole methodological point of the board in one line.

Agreed. And the corollary is that the method line on a certificate is not decoration, it is the number’s provenance.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_weiss74 points·2 years ago

This. A shoulder that does not baseline-resolve is a question, not a quantity.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]29 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_villalobos62 points·2 years ago

Small fix — 214nm, not 210. It matters for the comparison you are making with the other run.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/hplc

The analytical deep end: RP-HPLC methods, gradient design, integration decisions, LC-MS confirmation, amino-acid analysis, water content, and why two labs can report 98.1% and 96.4% on the same vial and both be right. Post the chromatogram, not the summary line.

32kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/hplc rules
  1. Chromatogram or it did not happen. Axis labels included.
  2. State the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume.
  3. Area% is not mass%. Posts that conflate them get a correction flair, not a removal.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.