GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.5k
c/glp1muscle·posted 1 year ago by u/mikkel_correia

how much of what we believe about protein actually comes from DEXA threads

Data Receipts ×9 Slow Clap ×1

Trying to get a straight answer on this: how much of what we believe about protein actually comes from DEXA threads.

Compared two scans from different clinics and panicked over a difference that was inside the error margin.

Kept the same programme for a year instead of changing it every six weeks. That was the change that worked.

Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.

Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.

1,846 up / 362 down84% upvoted31 commentsid 4b263v26 Sep 2024

31 comments

3 in this archive, depth 2

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/stubborn_batchlist_pls215 points·1 year ago

losing weight slower does not automatically preserve more lean mass

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram55 points·1 year ago

DEXA has a meaningful coefficient of variation, and it differs between machines and protocols. Comparing scans from different clinics adds a systematic offset that is invisible on the report.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_chowdhury115 points·1 year ago·edited

Some lean mass loss accompanies weight loss in any deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with the best evidence for limiting the proportion.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.