GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of help me understand lean mass, I have read the wiki twice — 49 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.7k
c/glp1muscle·submitted 6 months ago by u/tuva_kirchner

help me understand lean mass, I have read the wiki twice

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

help me understand lean mass, I have read the wiki twice. I would rather ask a basic question now than get this wrong quietly for two months. Two scans on the same machine 24 months apart. Lean mass held better than I expected and the lifts told the same story for free. Kept the same programme for a year instead of…

Read the full submission and all 49 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 6 months ago
u/noor_ivaturi176 points·6 months ago

Some lean mass loss accompanies weight loss in any deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with the best evidence for limiting the proportion.

replysharereportpermalink
u/karl_fischer_kev47 points·6 months ago

Started weighing protein rather than estimating it. The gap between what I thought and what I ate was embarrassing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchnerOP29 points·6 months ago·edited

Have the lifts held, dropped, or moved around?

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchnerOP114 points·6 months ago

DEXA has a real error margin and people quote it to one decimal

replysharereportpermalink
u/mariam_cabrera254 points·6 months ago

Strength retention is an imperfect but free longitudinal proxy: it is affected by neural factors and by being in a deficit, so it tracks tissue change loosely rather than exactly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/first_pen_fear88 points·6 months ago

grip strength and lift numbers are cheap longitudinal markers

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchnerOP54 points·6 months ago·edited

Are you comparing against your own baseline or against a published average?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.