GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] Canada — has anyone got a straight answer on chargeback — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.5k
c/cryptopay·submitted 5 months ago by u/arne_amankwah

[Question] Canada — has anyone got a straight answer on chargeback

Questionbranch of 10 comments

Genuine question, and the title is the question: Canada — has anyone got a straight answer on chargeback. Network fees are set by chain congestion at the time of sending. They are paid to the network, not to the recipient, and they vary by hour as well as by chain. Confirmations are the count of blocks built on top…

Read the full submission and all 51 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 5 months ago
u/blunt_coldbox_notes322 points·5 months ago

A test transaction costs one extra network fee and verifies the address, the network and the recipient’s crediting process before the main amount moves.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vitamin_d_void197 points·5 months ago

The transaction hash is the canonical receipt: it is public, verifiable by either party, and it is what a support query should quote.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_teixeira69 points·5 months ago

The transaction hash is the canonical receipt: it is public, verifiable by either party, and it is what a support query should quote.

Agreed — and the hash is the receipt. Nothing else is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwahOP0 points·5 months ago

Small fix — that is the network fee, not a supplier charge. The distinction matters for the complaint you are making.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sunday_shot_sal-19 points·5 months ago

Confirmation took forty minutes on a busy evening and I had already written half an angry message. Deleted it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwahOP1 point·5 months ago

a payment sent on the wrong network is usually gone

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_mensah1 point·5 months ago

screenshot the transaction hash, not the wallet balance

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_notes1 point·5 months ago

network and address, checked twice, before anything else

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/cryptopay

Paying for research material with crypto: which networks vendors actually credit, confirmation windows, memo/tag requirements, gas versus discount arithmetic, escrow for group buys, and the total absence of chargeback rights. Not investment discussion — payments only.

25kmembers
95submissions
Jan 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/cryptopay rules
  1. No price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion. Payments only.
  2. Never post a wallet address. Not yours, not a vendor's.
  3. No group-buy recruitment. Discussing how they fail is fine.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.