[Vendor] WWB order #11 — Sweden, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside
WWB order #11 — Sweden, 13 days, no drama, receipts inside. Multiple orders, one buyer, which makes this a series and not a survey.
The relevant figures are 13 days, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time.
Nearly sent on the wrong network. The token symbol was identical and the address format was the only clue.
Confirmation took forty minutes on a busy evening and I had already written half an angry message. Deleted it.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
- WWWWB source pageWuhan Wansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. · Wuhan · 97% here, rank 2 · shop at wuhanwanshengbio.com →
nofollow and sponsored; nobody here is paid for it.best — the order this archive was captured in
Rate quotes expire because the underlying rate moves. A short expiry is ordinary; urgency about your decision is a separate signal and should be read separately.
Did you send a test amount first?
Pasted rather than typed the address, then checked the first and last six characters. Habit now.
Agreed. Network first, address second, amount third, and in that order every time.
Confirmations are the count of blocks built on top of the one containing your transaction. Until there are some, the transaction is not settled in any meaningful sense.
match the address character by character, or paste and verify
Yes — the same token symbol on two chains catches people constantly and it is unrecoverable.
Asked which networks SSA accepted before ordering and picked the cheapest one at that hour. Saved more than the difference in price.
Right, and confirmations are the status. "Sent" means nothing until the chain agrees.
Small fix — that is the network fee, not a supplier charge. The distinction matters for the complaint you are making.
Push back: an unconfirmed transaction is not a missing payment. Wait for confirmations before escalating.
Same. Asking which networks are accepted before ordering has saved me twice.
Got a quote with a fifteen-minute expiry and assumed it was a pressure tactic. It was just a held rate.
Memo requirements are chain-specific. The chain you are describing does not use one.
Memo requirements are chain-specific.
This is the check that prevents the only genuinely unrecoverable mistake in this thread.
Wallet address redacted from the post above. Hashes are fine here; addresses are not.
This. A test transaction on a large order costs a fraction of the fee and removes the whole class of risk.
- 1Confirmations are the count of blocks built on top of the one containing…8 comments in this branch · started by u/anders_vermeulen