net peptide content vs purity — two different numbers, same vial, and only one is on your COA
Following on from the area% thread, because the same confusion turns up in a second form. People read a 10mg vial at 99% purity and conclude they have 9.9mg of peptide. They do not. Purity is a ratio between chromatographic species; it says nothing about total mass. Net peptide content is a separate assay and it…
One in eight across my folder, and it clusters hard by vendor. WXT and BCH have it most of the time. Everyone else, rarely, and usually only when somebody asked.
Which tells you the assay is not hard or expensive — it tells you it is not demanded. If a hundred people asked for it on every order it would be on every document inside a year.
that is a much more actionable read than mine. it is a demand problem, not a capability problem.
then ask. every order. it costs one sentence in an email and the aggregate effect over a community this size is not nothing.
same argument for water content and it worked on at least one vendor already.
and packaging. ERP rebuilt theirs around proper thermal mass and posted in the thread to say when the change had landed, which is the version of this that actually works.
the collective-nagging mechanism is genuinely the most effective tool this community has and it never gets written up as one.